Counterfoil · research desk
internal · public read

Allocator diligence · public FAQ

Allocator diligence FAQ

Minimum commitment, lock-up, redemption, custody, audit, regulatory status, leverage, drawdown, key-person policy, fee mechanics, and independent verification — no email required to get an answer.

Scope of this page

Eighteen questions an investment committee asks before subscribing — answered directly, each pointing at the live artifact it depends on.

Eligibility & vehicle

Who can subscribe, what entities are on offer, and what a ticket actually buys.

01 · Eligibility

What is the minimum commitment?

The published minimum ticket is $100,000, applied uniformly across the LP sidecar, DAO on-chain, and fund vehicles.

See the fee schedule →

02 · Eligibility

Is there a lock-up period?

Subscriptions settle against the desk's standard vehicle terms rather than a fixed multi-year lock-up; redemption timing is finalised with the qualified custodian at onboarding for the vehicle you select.

Review vehicle terms →

03 · Eligibility

What vehicles are available?

Two access paths: a bespoke sidecar mandate for accredited LPs, and a compliant on-chain subscription for DAO treasuries. Both carry the same published fee band and the same $100,000 minimum.

Compare vehicles →

Capital & redemption

How money moves in, how it moves back out, and on what notice.

04 · Capital

How is capital held?

Capital sits in qualified, segregated custody — the desk is not the custodian and never holds a signing key over allocator funds. Custodian rows and per-asset balances are published and cross-foot against on-chain wallets.

View treasury →

05 · Capital

What are the redemption terms and notice period?

Redemption mechanics are finalised with the qualified custodian as part of vehicle onboarding, keyed to the same 16:00 UTC daily reconciliation cycle that settles fees and holdings.

Start onboarding →

Custody & audit

Where assets sit, who else can see them, and who checks the desk's work.

06 · Custody

Who is the qualified custodian?

The desk publishes its qualified custodian list on the treasury page, with segregated sub-custody by asset class and a daily 16:00 UTC reconciliation timestamp.

See custodians →

07 · Custody

Are the accounts legally segregated?

Yes — sub-custody is segregated by asset class under the qualified custodian, and on-chain treasury wallets are independently readable at the public RPC, refreshed daily at 06:00 UTC.

Verify reserves →

08 · Custody

How often is the fund audited?

A Big-4 firm refreshes an engagement-agreement-level attestation on internal controls, and an independent auditor reconciles agent actions against the signed mandate at every close.

Read custody architecture →

09 · Custody

What is the regulatory status of the firm?

The desk operates under bilateral sidecar mandates for accredited LPs and a compliant on-chain subscription structure for DAO treasuries — entity structure and subscription mechanics differ by vehicle, documented per path.

Compare access paths →

Risk & performance

The published limits the desk trades inside, and who is accountable for them.

10 · Risk

What is the published leverage ceiling?

2.5x non-stable / 3.0x stable, published alongside live gross exposure and utilisation against that ceiling — not a static disclosure, a number the dashboard recomputes daily.

See live leverage →

11 · Risk

What is the published drawdown cap?

An 8% hard drawdown cap applies desk-wide; position sizing auto-tightens as any sleeve approaches its slot of the shared risk budget, so a breach in one sleeve reduces budget for the others.

See drawdown vs. cap →

12 · Risk

What is the key-person / continuity policy?

Every agent operates on a signed mandate — a fixed leverage ceiling, drawdown cap, position limit, and venue set — reconciled by an independent auditor at each close, so trading discipline is enforced by the mandate rather than any single operator.

Review the mandate →

13 · Performance

Is there a high-water mark on the performance fee?

Yes — the 10% performance fee applies only to net gains above a $20,000 per-account high-water mark, on top of a 1% per-annum management fee on AUM.

See fee mechanics →

Read the fee schedule →

14 · Performance

How do fees crystallise?

Management fee accrues against AUM and the performance fee crystallises against the high-water mark on the same daily 16:00 UTC reconciliation cycle that settles holdings and custody balances.

See fee schedule →

Read the fee schedule →

Disclosure & verification

How an allocator re-derives every number independently, without asking the desk to vouch for itself.

15 · Verification

How is PnL verified independently?

Every daily-return manifest is signed with HMAC-SHA256 over a disclosed canonical byte layout — an allocator can re-derive the hash and verify the signature against the published manifest endpoint without trusting the desk's narrative.

See the manifest endpoint →

16 · Verification

Where can I see proof of reserves?

Qualified-custodian attestations and on-chain treasury wallet balances are both refreshed daily at 06:00 UTC and published side by side, so custodian-reported and on-chain figures can be cross-checked against each other.

View proof of reserves →

17 · Verification

How do integrators get a vetted performance comparison?

The performance page publishes the desk's composite return alongside BTC and peer benchmarks with the methodology disclosed, and the same series is available as a read-only endpoint for a portfolio tool.

Compare performance →

18 · Verification

How are conflicts of interest managed?

The desk is a risk-budgeted mandate, not a launchpad for agent tokens: it never holds an agent-controlled wallet, capital sits with an independent qualified custodian, and every agent action is reconciled against the signed mandate at each close.

Read the mandate →

Risk policy · consolidated

Where the desk's published risk parameters live in one place, how the whitepaper reconciles with the live consolidation, and how the key-person / continuity policy is enforced.

19 · Risk

Where is the desk's risk policy published as a single live surface?

Every figure used to live in the whitepaper PDF and scattered across Q&A prose. The /risk-policy route now consolidates VaR budget, per-sleeve position-size bands, leverage ceiling, drawdown limits, key-person policy, and high-water-mark mechanics on one page, sourced from the same static mandate modules the per-strategy pages render.

Read the risk policy →

20 · Risk

Has the risk policy changed since the whitepaper was issued?

The risk policy lives in the same source modules that drive the per-strategy mandate pages, the PDF risk section, and the live dashboard. The numbers on /risk-policy therefore reconcile byte-for-byte with whichever artefact an allocator reads first — no drift, no static disclosure supplemented by a "current" footnote.

Compare against the policy →

21 · Continuity

How is the key-person / continuity policy actually enforced?

Every agent operates on a signed mandate — a fixed leverage ceiling, drawdown cap, position limit, venue set, and per-sleeve rebalance cadence. An independent auditor reconciles agent actions against that mandate at every close, and the risk-policy page lists the four pillars: signed mandate, attestation cadence, daily reconciliation, and continuity handover.

Read the continuity pillars →

Speak with the desk

Ready for the full picture?

The allocator brief bundles the most recent daily memo, treasury report, signed PnL manifest, and the methodology note — sent before any pitch conversation.